Guidelines for enterprises to develop emergency response plan for work place accidents (English Version)
Revision dimensions | 2013 version | 2020 version |
---|---|---|
Procedure compilation | 7 steps | 8 steps (new desktop exercise) |
Capability assessment | Emergency capability assessment | Emergency resource survey |
Attachment requirements | 5 types of attachments | 8 types of attachments (new risk assessment results, etc.) |
Phase I: Basic preparation
Establish a cross-departmental preparation working group (must include safety management department, production department, etc.), collect 12 types of basic information such as laws and regulations, historical accident cases, etc.
Phase II: Risk assessment
Use the LEC method to quantitatively assess risk levels and determine the four-level warning indicators of red/orange/yellow/blue
Phase III: System construction
Establish a three-level plan system of "comprehensive + special + on-site", and clarify the start-up conditions of the emergency command center's emergency command system
Phase IV: Verification and implementation
Verify the feasibility of the plan through desktop exercises, and issue it after completing the three-level review procedures
The standard requires the establishment of a dynamic emergency resource ledger, which must include:
? Internal resources: Emergency material warehouse reserve list, emergency team qualification documents
? External resources: List of agreed rescue forces within a 5-kilometer radius
? Resource gap analysis report (needs to be updated every quarter)
Application example of a chemical company:
? Level 1 response (plant shutdown): involving leakage of major hazardous sources
? Level 2 response (partial shutdown): single device failure affects surrounding areas
? Level 3 response (job disposal): minor equipment leakage
Phase | Time node | Work content |
---|---|---|
Difference Analysis | 2021Q1 | Conduct gap analysis against the 7 major technical changes in the new version |
Resource census | 2021Q2 | Complete the establishment of the emergency resource GIS system |
System reconstruction | 2021Q3 | Rebuild the three-level plan file structure |
1. Formal review: Avoid having the safety department complete the plan review alone. It must include equipment management, production process and other multi-field experts
2. Incomplete resource survey: Common omissions include contractor emergency resources and mutual assistance agreements with neighboring companies
3. Fuzzy response classification: No clear quantitative indicators (e.g., a level 1 response is initiated when the leakage volume is ≥5 tons)
Copyright ?2007-2025 ANTPEDIA, All Rights Reserved